*
Go Matilda * *Your Gateway to Australia *
*
*
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
Farmer - reveal all, and I may change my mind!

Best regards.


Alan Collett
alan-at-gomatilda-dot-com
Registered Migration Agent Number 0102534
Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia
http://www.gomatilda.com and
http://www.collettandco.co.uk
Offices in Southampton - England; Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane, and Geelong - Australia
 
Posts: 3067 | Location: Geelong, Australia | Registered: 01 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
PS. Remember that I have dealt with the tax and immigration authorities for many a year now, and unless they can be bound by an opinion (usually expressed in writing) I tend to take what they say verbally or informally with a pinch of salt ... particularly in an area such as this where (in my view - for the present at least) there is no specific published guidance on what constitutes a "private nature" forex gain or loss.

This said, please don't think I'm not receptive to hearing your experiences.


Alan Collett
alan-at-gomatilda-dot-com
Registered Migration Agent Number 0102534
Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia
http://www.gomatilda.com and
http://www.collettandco.co.uk
Offices in Southampton - England; Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane, and Geelong - Australia
 
Posts: 3067 | Location: Geelong, Australia | Registered: 01 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
PPS. Did the opinion which you obtained (Farmer) say a forex gain in the hands of a migrant isn't assessable because it is private in nature?

If so, did the opinion say WHY it is private in nature, and on what basis such a gain would be considered to be private in nature? Is there any reference to underlying case law or legislation?


Alan Collett
alan-at-gomatilda-dot-com
Registered Migration Agent Number 0102534
Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia
http://www.gomatilda.com and
http://www.collettandco.co.uk
Offices in Southampton - England; Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane, and Geelong - Australia
 
Posts: 3067 | Location: Geelong, Australia | Registered: 01 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Alan Collett:
PPS. Did the opinion which you obtained (Farmer) say a forex gain in the hands of a migrant isn't assessable because it is private in nature?

If so, did the opinion say WHY it is private in nature, and on what basis such a gain would be considered to be private in nature? Is there any reference to underlying case law or legislation?


The advice has lots of boiler plate and refers to different parts of the legislation but does not define “of a private or domestic nature”. It would seem to me to be difficult to define beyond what the ATO have already told me except by listing what it does not cover and which is therefore taxable.

Regards
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: 04 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
From what I am hearing from you (Farmer) and others anecdotally it seems likely that the ATO's approach in this area is similar to the 6 month "window" that applies in the area of pension transfers - the exemption from applying the strict letter of the legislation isn't actually provided for in the legislation (so far as I know), but ATO policy is nevertheless to allow an exemption.

In other words, even though there doesn't seem to be anything one could rely on in the event one is challenged by the ATO, the tax office practice would seem to be to allow individual taxpayers to ignore forex gains and losses.

Nevertheless I think we should continue to press for an ATO statement in this area, to obtain clarity on which we can all rely.

Best regards.


Alan Collett
alan-at-gomatilda-dot-com
Registered Migration Agent Number 0102534
Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia
http://www.gomatilda.com and
http://www.collettandco.co.uk
Offices in Southampton - England; Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane, and Geelong - Australia
 
Posts: 3067 | Location: Geelong, Australia | Registered: 01 August 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Alan,

Having taken another long look at all the documentation I have come to the conclusion that as far as the new legislation in 775 is concerned there is an exemption from forex transactions of a private nature and that this was always the intention of the law.

However, when they introduced section 775 they did not do anything to tidy up the CGT legislation so that foreign currency even in private hands is still regarded as a CGT asset and thus any gain on currency could be deemed assessable under CGT.

Remember that a forex gain under 775 is regarded as revenue whereas previously a gain on currency would have come under CGT.

It may well be that the ATO recognise that they have screwed up but do not wish to do so publically which is why they are prepared to give private rulings following the intention of the law.

This is not satisfactory and the ATO needs to come clean.
 
Posts: 206 | Registered: 13 March 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
jim
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paddy:
Alan,

Having taken another long look at all the documentation I have come to the conclusion that as far as the new legislation in 775 is concerned there is an exemption from forex transactions of a private nature and that this was always the intention of the law.

However, when they introduced section 775 they did not do anything to tidy up the CGT legislation so that foreign currency even in private hands is still regarded as a CGT asset and thus any gain on currency could be deemed assessable under CGT.

Remember that a forex gain under 775 is regarded as revenue whereas previously a gain on currency would have come under CGT.

It may well be that the ATO recognise that they have screwed up but do not wish to do so publically which is why they are prepared to give private rulings following the intention of the law.

This is not satisfactory and the ATO needs to come clean.


In the end it seems to come down to when you opened the bank account from which the transfer was made. I am fortunate that although I have made dozens of transfers they have all been from accounts opened before 1985 or after July 2003. Hence any gains are exempt from both forex rules and cgt.

Regards
 
Posts: 22 | Registered: 14 December 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


© The Go Matilda Trading Company Limited 2002
*
Go Matilda