I have been offered two similar jobs, to be based in Sydney, but I don't know which is the best salary. Both are on a 457 visa with LAFHA, however Job #1 gives the actual LAFHA entitlements, whereas Job #2 LAFHA will be calculated when I start the job.
Job #1: Basic salary: 100K Superann: 9K LAFHA House & Food Allowance: 41K Total Package: 150K
Job #2: Basic salary: 143K Superann: 12.9K Total Package: 155.9K
So I need your advise in determining which is the best salary package.
Job #2) Earn $143Kpa, tax $45,050pa leaving $1,884/week. Slightly improved by an extra $75/week super. ($3,900pa)
Of course these assume a full financial year from 1/7 to 30/6. The situation is slightly different if the income is for only part of a financial year. However, the choice seems clear to me, if you can get some of your income tax free (as a lahfa) then it's obviously the way to go.
heers Bob Johnson
Posts: 116 | Location: Perth | Registered: 13 August 2006
Job #2 weekly salary could be higher if adjusted for LAFHA. For example, if you assumed $550 per week for rent, plus $220 for food, giving a total LAFHA value of $770 per week. And assuming LAFHA effectively means not paying tax on $770, which increases the weekly income after tax by 40% of $770, i.e. an increase of $308, giving a total of $2192 per week.
Tax rates and income thresholds are subject to today's Federal Budget ...
Best regards.
Alan Collett alan-at-gomatilda-dot-com Registered Migration Agent Number 0102534 Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia http://www.gomatilda.com and http://www.collettandco.co.uk Offices in Southampton - England; Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane, and Geelong - Australia
Posts: 2573 | Location: Geelong, Australia | Registered: 01 August 2002